March 27, 2009 - 3:37pm
I've got 2 greens here and they're lookin mighty good lol.. would that set me back into major wd's?
March 27, 2009 - 4:08pm
#2
Would love to read this FDA
Would love to read this FDA information, woodstock, as far as I know Watson has not received any "warnings" reguarding unapproved of ineffective medications. Watsons 10/650 "503's" are one of the few Watson products I even like anymore. I would also like to add that Watson was approved to make this med Setember 29, 1995. So this wouldnt be one of those cases of a manufacturer making a med that was never approved, like the 50 something meds KV/ Ethex distributed that they never had approval for.
hampton, if it has been 5 days and you are not experiencing physical withdrawals anymore then it is unlikely (but does happen) to start the physical dependance cycle over again. Normally it takes 7-10 days of repetative use to develope physical withdrawals (ie. diarhea, runny nose, chills, sweats, leg cramps, backache, headache,nausea, lack of sleep etc.) when hydrocodone is stopped. However, those two tablets are more than enough to restart the psychological addiction all over again. Once those two tabs wear off you will start craving that high all over again, it will be more of that mental urge rather than, the "im dope sick and need to fix it" urge. And if you were an addict you will start your old habits all over again, be it the mission of finding someone to buy from, stealing money to get some more, pinching your grammas stash, etc.
March 27, 2009 - 4:08pm
#3
but lets just say they were
but lets just say they were good. would they set me into major wd's again?
March 27, 2009 - 5:02pm
#4
well
PHYSICALLY? ABSOLUTELY NOT
PSYCHOLOGICALLLY...well IMHO
Depends on why you "quit" and that is a very wide variable
March 27, 2009 - 9:01pm
#5
regarding FDA
Solo the FDA told me in a phone conversation of the warnings they sent out, i too would ve not beleived watsons quality control won t let this happen, FDA says it was a hi demand for product, generic medications, an lo supply of ingredeints, seems all the online pharmcys, an bootleg medication has took heavy tow on ingredient supply, i too am currently taking a watson 7.5, our doctor knew we were creidible, our counts were right, we went out of our way to show her that we were nt abuser s, nor dealers having independant tests done at our exspense, dr was worried in concerns of the pain management contract we had to sign to receive narcotic meds , if you fail twice they no longer write sripts, who would ve thought meds would be ineffective, the dr back was against the wall, she had to prove either the drug was ineffective or my wifes organs was failing primary the kidney since liver detoxs most of the apap, as she could lose her license either way she had to come to a conculsion, after my wife failed 3rd unrine test at my exspense, so she had her take a weekend supply of 7.5/500 same regimen as mine, an she had a observatory test taken 2 nurses witnessed her take pill, wait at clinic for 3 hours not allowed to leave, they then draw blood an have chem 14 test done an kidney function test, 1 week later results are back, dr called said my wifes test resulted in postive for opiates kidneys are fine continued her 7,5/500, will see her in 6 wks, after going around with clinic being told you re a dealer, abuser you ll push back too, my wifes regimen of hyrocodone 10/650 was the only was the only patient getting that dosage at that drugstore but 3 different lot#s fail urine screens, i hope that physicans will consider changing pain management contracts as if the drug screen comes back 1st time neg, they inform you of such, an that they do a observation test the 2nd time before cutting someone off, my brother see s a dr an is treated for lupus he is given a on-site urine screen if med does nt show nurse does nt hand him his script, there is also a web site in houston texas where fox news ran where pharmacy was buying fake chinese placebos, p.s, watson has offered to reimburse us , they requested 2 samples an had 4 weeks to do test on 1st 1 when they made offer
March 27, 2009 - 10:04pm
#6
Unless you don't consider...
potentially backsliding into full blown dependence a "set back," you'll be fine! I'd think twice... Stay well.
March 27, 2009 - 10:22pm
#7
solo in regards to ineffective hyrocodone
just been told that all veterans getting generic hyrocodone thru veterans adminitration, were late getting their march refills by cousin, he called veterans administration inquiring as to why his pain meds were late, the reason was supply an demand, like i said earlier i never believe that this could happen, but who would ve believed 15 yrs ago or so that about 7 people would ve died from tampered tylnol, i agree that watsons product s have been good never had trouble till winter of 08, its not that they intentionally done it i think but that a bad batch or 2 was run thru, its like a auto being built in a assembly line just because it says its a luxury sedan does mean that a few lemons come off the line, i m for sure watsons thought they were getting grade 1 ingredeints, but something happened
i would nt bet on it, since oct 08 FDA has informed all major manufactors of unapproved an ineffective ingredeints spouse took her script for 4 months fail 3 drug screens till we found out, the numbers on them was 503